Tag-Archive for » Links «

We interrupt this scheduled ranting…

This Christmas, I am doing something I haven’t done before, even though I’ve tried: I’m making a lot of my gifts (hence the sewing machine research).  I am NOT a crafty person; in fact, I HATE crafts, as anyone who worked with me in the Children’s Department at the library knows well.  However, the engineer in me does like designing things, and I do sketch, write calligraphy (Asian and Roman) and whip up spa items from time to time.  I also sew a bit, having started with the mega-project of sewing my own wedding dress (I’ll scan and post a pic later today).  Anyway, I’m busy making gifts but I saw this post from GetRichSlowly, one of my favorite blogs, and I thought it was a great idea to pass on.

The Anti-Stuff Holiday Gift Guide

Meaningful, personal gifts
Anti-Stuff gifts aren’t necessarily gift cards, which often feel a bit impersonal. Think about what would be meaningful to the recipient. If your sister is a busy mom, give her a couple of hours of babysitting and an appointment with a masseuse. Consider the following to generate anti-Stuff gift ideas unique to each loved one:

  • Hobbies
  • Lifestyle (parent, student, on-the-go, homebody…)
  • Anything he or she has “always wanted to do”

Word of warning: make sure the gift is something the recipient would enjoy or something in which he or she has expressed interest, not something you like or think he or she should like! That holds true with any sort of gift-giving.

Read the rest at GetRichSlowly

Share
Category: Links  Tags:  Leave a Comment

Rant san: The illusory ‘values’ option

Please note:  To leave your own rant, see the comment section.
#3  The conservative movement represents “family values.”

A few years back, my in-laws got me a subscription to World. World is an uber-conservative magazine that claims to focus on global issues, but is really just a rag for propaganda. Yes, I said it — propaganda. This is not because I “disagree” with World, although on many issues, I do. Propaganda is its own form of journalism, and there are several conduits for such journalism on both sides of the political line (on the liberal side, see Mother Jones). Anyway, I was reading along in World when I reached an article about campaign finance reform, where the magazine claimed that finance reform for political contributions was “unGodly” and that readers should call their representative before this terrible blight on Christian values was allowed to pass.

When people go on about family values, I think: 'Methinks thou dost protest too much'...

Um, excuse me?

Finance reform is unGodly?

This was the point where I tossed the magazine aside, and sent all the rest of the issues (yes, they came for 18 long months) into the recycling where they belonged. It is exactly this kind of rhetoric that makes me foam at the mouth. Anti-corruption legislation (oooo, that’s the other term for “finance reform”), if God were to decide on it, would probably not be unGodly. That’s just a guess. Not that I know what God is thinking. And for that matter, neither does World magazine. So claiming “rightness” and “Godliness” for issues like this…well, like I said, it just makes me foam at the mouth.

In reality, I started looking more closely at my conservative stance when I was 19 and on an internship that led me to Iowa.  My mentor, Sande, and his wife, Margo, are two of the kindest, most ‘Christian’ people I’ve ever met, yet they thought differently about life and politics (Margo was head of the Iowa Democratic party for some years) and I spent a lot of time listening to what they said and why they believed it.  I realized that liberal values were actually more in line with what I believed than conservative values, but that I had consistently fallen for the face value of the conservative ‘line’.  And that, folks, is how I became a bleeding heart liberal – because not everyone gets the same start, life isn’t fair, and sometimes those who have much need to give to those who have less.

More than this, though, I came to understand how really crucial it is for churches and religion to stay out of politics.  We talk a lot about theocracy in the Middle East, and how detrimental it can be; what people don’t consider is how dangerous theocracy can be in our own country. (More on this later…also, ignore the “read more” links at the bottom here, I’m changing my theme and I’ve got some kinks to work out) (oops, now it works!)

Share
Category: Links  Tags:  Leave a Comment

Rant scratchy: Truth or War

My number two rant about certain conservative politics:
Jesus loves you. God Bless America.

Let’s go to war.

The Simpsons sometimes makes more sense than the news...

The Simpsons sometimes makes more sense than the news...

I see a lot of people these days talking about how we shouldn’t have gone to war in Iraq, and strangely, some of them are the same people who accused me of disloyalty and being unpatriotic to my country when I thought we shouldn’t go to war in Iraq — back in 2003. In fact, on March 20, 2003, I drove in search of a church, any church, where I could pray that we would not go to (another) war, and when I heard the announcement on the radio that we had invaded Iraq I still hadn’t found an open church and I pulled over to the side of the road and cried like a baby. One of the strangest disconnects about the conservative movement, particularly the conservative Christian movement, is this need to celebrate war and the military. I understand this comes out of a cultural battle that started in the 1960s with the hippie, anti-war movement, but what I don’t understand is how we can still be fighting about it now, forty, almost fifty years later.

The antiwar movement of the 60s still invokes powerful emotions today.

The antiwar movement of the 60s still invokes powerful emotions today.

One of the things I thought when I was in labor with Ben (22 hours with no pain meds people!) was, how could anyone send their child off to war? After this much pain and this much hardship just getting a single child out into the world? I cannot imagine anything dearer to me than my children, and at that point, when I gave birth to Ben, I realized that I would always be an advocate for peace.

Many people justify war, giving Hitler as an illustration, but although Hitler caused the death of 5 million Jewish people, as well as a few million more of gypsies, homosexuals and others who didn’t fit into his idea of a pure society, 60 million people died because of the war itself. So Hitler was directly responsible for 7 million deaths, while the war itself — including multiple countries — claimed 53 million more. It is possible that Europe would have been occupied by Germany and more terrible atrocities committed by Hitler if we had not gone to war (although 60 million is a big number), and I understand this argument, but look at that other “what-if” possibility — the assassination of Hitler and a quick removal of his regime could have saved tens of millions of people. War is not a good solution, nor is it Godly, and I wish that our country would not so easily send our youth out to be killed in the name of patriotism. This idea that “not going to war” is somehow unpatriotic is still absurd to me — there’s a difference between throwing dirt at a wounded soldier, and saying “Hey, let’s not send this guy to get wounded” in the first place. I definitely prefer the latter.

Share

Top rants for this November — Rant ichi

Lately I’ve been looking for a sewing machine, and in doing so I’ve come across a lot of conservative (female) blogs. I find it curious to read these types of blogs, since this is my mirror image — so much the same, and yet everything flipped the other direction. So, I decided to write and publish my top five rants, and, since each rant is long, I’m only going to post one a day, thus leaving plenty of time for rude remarks, virtual flip-offs, and angry commentary (see comment section below to leave vicious insults).

Interestingly enough, as I’ve grown older, my tolerance of certain opinions and stances has gone way down. Yes, when I was in college, I was close enough to my small-town roots to ‘understand’, in a sense, when people thought I was wasting my time going to school when I should be getting married and starting a family. Ten years later, I no longer waste my time listening to opinions like this, because anyone who doesn’t believe in the education of women isn’t really worth my time.

I have often heard that people “harden” in their opinions as they get older; as my dad likes to say, “I’m getting set in my ways.” However, it is rather interesting to feel it in myself. Last night, unable to fall asleep, I lay in bed compiling my top pet peeves about conservative politics, and I fully plan to offend all my conservative friends by posting it here.

#1

Women should stay at home, in traditional roles. Now go vote for Sarah Palin (or, more currently, hope she runs for president in 2012).

I stole this picture from a conservative blog, and I found it satisyingly vindictive.

I stole this picture from a conservative blog, and I found it satisyingly vindictive.

I’ve tried not to talk about Sarah Palin too much on my blog, primarily because I didn’t want to add to her publicity any more than I ought to, but here is a prime example of someone who a) Is female, b) advocates “traditional roles” for women, and c) ran for the Vice Presidency and is considering running for U.S. President, which is not a “traditional role” for a woman (check out the article, where the theologians hedge and say that civil magistrates aren’t specified in the Bible so Sarah Palin is in a ‘theological loophole’. Wow, wish they’d mentioned that to my church at home, when they didn’t even want me to go to college.). Do we see that a + b = c, with c being “a whole lot of hypocrisy”?

I, of course, would love for women to be in politics, or to succeed in anything they want to. If women want to be doctors or firemen or construction workers, hurray! If a woman wants to be president, hurray! What I really hate, though, is someone who wants to advocate for a traditional role by not being in a traditional role (Yes, I’m looking at YOU, Ann Coulter!). To me, these people are nothing more than thieves who stand on the hard work of women who fought against “tradition” in order for women’s voices to be heard, and then shout that women shouldn’t be heard! Oh, except for them. This, in a nutshell, is why I can’t stand the Sarah Palins and Ann Coulters of this world, and it has nothing to do with their beauty or passion or any of that — it’s the fact that they are big, fat hypocrites, and that makes me crazy.

Share